<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sharpsteen Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharpsteenlaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharpsteenlaw.com</link>
	<description>Sharp Minds. Cutting Edge Representation. Every Time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Unlawful Search Tactics</title>
		<link>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2012/03/unlawful-search-tactics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unlawful-search-tactics</link>
		<comments>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2012/03/unlawful-search-tactics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bowdish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharpsteenlaw.com/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tampa Bay Times recently reported about a Pinellas detective dressed as Progress Energy worker in search of marijuana. No evidence of marijuana cultivation was discovered when the resident escorted a detective onto his property.&#8211;But, what if there was? Would the evidence be thrown out despite the resident&#8217;s consent to enter the property? A few years ago, the Florida Supreme [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2012/03/unlawful-search-tactics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facing Foreclosure?  A Chapter 7 or 13 Bankruptcy may be the answer!</title>
		<link>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2012/03/facing-foreclosure-a-chapter-7-or-13-bankruptcy-may-be-the-answer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facing-foreclosure-a-chapter-7-or-13-bankruptcy-may-be-the-answer</link>
		<comments>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2012/03/facing-foreclosure-a-chapter-7-or-13-bankruptcy-may-be-the-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sharpsteen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharpsteenlaw.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that foreclosures are a driving force in bankruptcy filings?  If you are facing foreclosure, ask Sharpsteen Law what you options may be &#8230;  from modifications, short sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, Chapter 7 &#38; Chapter 13 Bankruptcies &#8230; we will provide you with ALL of your options based upon over 15 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2012/03/facing-foreclosure-a-chapter-7-or-13-bankruptcy-may-be-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trial Experience Counts! &#8211; Ask Your Tampa Bay Attorney</title>
		<link>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2011/03/federal-criminal-defense/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=federal-criminal-defense</link>
		<comments>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2011/03/federal-criminal-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sharpsteen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharpsteenlaw.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attorney Sharpsteen co-counsels with Attorney Anne F. Borghetti on all Federal Criminal matters.  With over 35 years of experience handling thousands of cases and over 100 trials between them in both the Federal and State Courts, the client has the benefit of two attorneys actively working on their case. Of course, first priority would be attempts to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sharpsteenlaw.com/2011/03/federal-criminal-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

